Evolution of Teachers Theory

A student aspiring to become a teacher observes the negative and positive attributes of every teacher they learn from throughout their education. (In the ideal performance of this theory, these teachers are presumed to have done the same before they became educators themselves, although this is most likely not the case.) If they had done this, then THIS CURRENT STUDENT learning from any one of these teachers shall be even better. X learns from Y (who has already gathered information from A, B, C, and D) and from Z (who has been taught by E, F and G). When this new student teacher W arrives, he or she will learn from X who has already accumulated Y and Z, therefore leading to a even more evolved teacher. But, instead of it being closed to the 26 letters in the alphabet, imagine this process on an infinite scale. Teachers never stop evolving as long as they continue integrating their experiences and adopted effective ways of teaching from previous teachers. This is the basic principle of evolution but from the perspective of education. What is the point? My primary reasoning for significance is that teachers should only be progressing as time continues to pass, and if they are not, then there must be glitches somewhere in the process. From my experiences, teachers have not been evolving enough for this theory to be true. Therefore, education is not traveling on the correct theoretical path (in my opinion) and must be significantly changed.